Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Is it okay that the UN wants to give away half of California to the Abujans, who currently live in Colombia!?
Is it okay that the UN wants to give away half of California to the Abujans, who currently live in Colombia!?
The Abujans are Native Americans. The group's Holy book, the Abuja, mentions that their ancient Holy Land is in the southern area of California, roughly extending from Los Angeles down to the Mexican border. There are some Abujans (a very small number, perhaps 2-10%) that live in Southern California now, in peace with everyone else. The UN has dominion over this southern part of California. Do you think it's okay if the UN declares a new State will be made in this part of California and it will serve as the Homeland for the Abuja, as it is their "Historical Homeland," referenced by their Holy Book. These Native Americans suffered greatly at the hands of Colombians; it was essentially a Holocaust. They didn't suffer at the hands of Southern Californians, though. They've essentially suffered everywhere they've been. They say they need this Homeland to be safe, since no one else accepts them. Millions of Abujans from around the World can then go to Southern California. Do you think it's a good idea for the UN to take the Land and Homes of the people that currently live in Southern California and designate it the new Homeland for the Abuja? No? Do you think that Southern Californians, Northern Californians, and Americans in general might consider this to be a little Unjust? You think they might fight back? Yes? Then you kind of understand how Palestinians feel. Christian AND Muslim Palestinians. Here's a site that is maintained by a troupe of PhD students at Harvard, Stanford, UC Berkeley, UCLA, and the London School of Economics, in addition to contributing scholars, that describes what Americans NEED TO KNOW about the situation in Palestine and Israel: Here it is again: http://www.ifamericansknew.org/ Mark, i agree with you about the White European genocide of Native Americans. i was just trying my best to create a parallel to demonstrate that Stealing peoples Land (whether their Palestinian or Native American) is Abhorrent.
Military - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
In reference to the Abujans, yes, the should be given a sizable tract of land to call their home. White Europeans invaded the Native American's home and killed almost every single one of them, not just in California, but all over the US and Canada. Concerning Palestine, it was the WWII ALies, lead by the US, that encouraged Zionism and the creation of Israel. Why was Hitler's holocaust considered a tragedy and the American holocuast allowed?
2 :
I like the group you chose to demonstrate your point because my dad is Nigerian (from Abuja, haha). The "Abujans" should get the Land because what European Colonization did to the Natives (and i think you'll agree with me on this given what you've written in other answers...but i understand you were trying to demonstrate a point) was absolute Genocide. I don't think anything compares to it; not even the holocaust. But of course i see your point about Israel and Palestine. They (the British) basically took away the Palestinians Lands and gave it to Jewish Settlers. i like your point about the 2-10% because in 1882 the jewish population in Palestine was only 8%, while the non-Jewish population was 92%. By the time Israel was created in 1948, the non-Jewish population (i.e. Palestinian Christians and Palestinian Muslims) was only 14%: http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsou… The creation of Israel was an absolute disaster. And today, they have the longest running Occupation on the planet. The entire World Excoriates Israel - Europe, Africa, Asia, the Middle East, South America, etc. - for its Brutal Occupation of Palestine. In fact, the EU and UN have been trying to sentence Israeli leaders as war criminals. NELSON MANDELA himself Scolded Israel for their Brutal Apartheid Occupation (source:http://www.progressiveaustin.org/mandela… This relationship is the number One Reason that America Is Targeted by Militants (Muslim AND Christian - cause there are a lot of Arab Christians, like Shakira, Salmay Hayek, Ralph Nader, Nidal Ahmadieh (god she's hot), etc. ). Did everyone forget about Sirhan Sirhan, the Palestinian CHRISTIAN that assassinated Robert Kennedy? I don't understand (and neither does the Rest of The World) why America lends unquivocal, unprecedented support to Israel. Israel is a Big Boy. It's by far the most Militarily Advanced country in the region, and the Overwhelming Power in the Middle East. It can take care of itself. Like President Carter said, Israel has more than 160 Nuclear War Heads (although among academic circles, we understand it to be around 200). That's 160 more than any of its neighbors, LOL ! I reiterate: Israel can definitely take care of itself. I think AIPAC is probably the reason why, though, that the US fully backs the Isralei governement even though it hurts America's Interests and national security. Fortune did say it was the second most Powerful Lobby in Washington: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/f… Which makes it the most Powerful Lobby on American Foreign Policy in Washington. By far. Thanks for that great website. I'm a postdoc student in England. I could use those statistics!
Read more other entries :
